Another direction
Under the conditions of any government regime, there are identical specific services that, despite ideological differentiation, perform based on standard international protocol, such as distinguished service, and diplomatic missions.
The desire to dominate is an integral part of the human genetic code. After the transition to the patriarchal era, due to masculine deviations, aggressive physical confrontations often took place between societies throughout history. However, it must be said that there were facts with a positive precedent, for example, in the territory of ancient Mesopotamia, where there were many city-states that had their sovereign claims and independent languages, and at the same time they still used a common diplomatic language, Babylonian. It is surprising, although it is a fact that the first diplomatic truce took place in 2850 BC, the treaty is considered the first example in the history of diplomacy that dialogue is the basis of mutual understanding.
What is happening now, many thousands of years later, in our electronic age, even in the process of our cultural reconstruction, is high-tech superpowers are using lethal weapons in wars, unfortunately even today human life is devalued.
The fact is that the diplomatic missions created by us are not able to fulfill the mission assigned to them, we must, every day, discuss the diplomatic mistakes and plans and try to correct them.
In the territory of the largest superstate, it is necessary to initiate the creation of international dialogue clubs, where young adults will be invited and important topics will be discussed, first of all, cultural and artistic topics that unite us the most. An international forum for debate must be created to allow all independent-minded young people to express their thoughts, young people must discuss religious values and similarities in traditions, and adults must clearly distinguish topics such as the damage caused by racism to the world, discrimination and hatred as the origin of evil and violence so on.
Administrators of embassies should clearly understand that supporting such activities is the weapon that will save peace in the future in different regions.
The main problem of embassies and similar institutions is that they refrain from cooperating with public structures that try to raise the culture and, to raise the interest of international communities, start active dialogues between people.
Every such civic idea should be of great value to the embassy, and concerned citizens are a good source for future positive dynamics and a useful action factor for the structure. The main principle based on equality must be considered for any civil individual. After such features, work should be started on a clearly defined action plan regarding the integration of foreign diplomatic missions into the supersociety.
Equally important is the involvement of educational institutions in similar projects. The legitimate cooperation of the world’s leading American universities with other institutions with a common goal will make the struggle for the main goal of the project even more meaningful. During the period of active cultural exchange, I think that many interesting topics will be raised, which will certainly interest the administration of universities and departments, and will ultimately have a positive effect on educational institutions.