Nikoloz Gvasalia

 197 PO BOX

 Avon, CT 06001

 Nikushagvasal@gmail.com

 7/11/2023

Samantha Power, Administrator United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Ronald Reagan Building 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, 

NW Washington, D.C. 20523

Subject: Request for Support to Foster Housing Development and Journalistic Collaboration in Ukraine

Dear Administrator Samantha Power,

I hope this letter finds you in good health and high spirits. My name is Nikoloz Gvasalia, and I am a journalist volunteer associated with the Fermata Arts Foundation (FAF) based in Georgia. As a passionate advocate for sensitive journalism, I am writing to bring to your attention an ambitious project aimed at fostering housing development and strengthening journalistic collaboration in Ukraine.

The project, titled “Ukrainian Houses: Reflecting Hope and Equilibrium,” seeks to address the critical need for housing development in Ukraine, while simultaneously encouraging the exchange of ideas and perspectives among journalists from the post-Soviet countries. Our vision is to establish a uniform team of journalists, representing various journalistic companies from the post-Soviet space, to collaborate on this endeavor.

The proposed project entails the creation of up to 1,000 residential units in Ukraine, strategically placed in locations associated with historical significance. These homes will embody the sensitivity and aspirations of the Ukrainian people, showcasing their unique way of life. The project will also establish the headquarters of the shipbuilding industry in Nikolaev, Kherson, and Odessa, fostering economic growth and development in these cities.

To realize this project, we estimate a total cost of $4 billion. We have received applications from mayors of various Ukrainian cities, demonstrating their commitment and support. Furthermore, we plan to engage the active student population from Ukraine and other post-Soviet countries to serve as correspondents, forming a network of correspondence points. Their primary task will be to capture and document the vision through drawings created by artists from post-Soviet countries, specifically highlighting places of military battles and involving the art team of observers from the Ukrainian population.

In collaboration with the Fermata Arts Foundation, the art drawings will be sent to a designated plant in the forest-rich state of Vermont, where modular structures will be manufactured. These structures will then be disassembled into transportable parts and shipped to Ukraine for installation in locations that allow residents to envision and embrace the art houses.

We believe that the realization of this project will require the support and collaboration of esteemed organizations such as USAID. The funds required for this endeavor amount to $25 billion, including the final presentation of all houses built according to the art drawings curated by the Fermata Arts Foundation. We kindly request your assistance in securing the necessary resources and support to bring this project to fruition.

Furthermore, I would like to take this opportunity to request the establishment of two FAF journalist offices. The first office would be based in Georgia, to foster journalistic collaboration and support sensitive reporting. The second office would be established in Russia, facilitating cross-border communication and understanding.

I have attached my contact information below for your reference:

Name: Nikoloz Gvasalia Email: nikushagvasal@gmail.com Phone: 908-300-9891

I kindly request your consideration and support in realizing this transformative project. By fostering housing development and strengthening journalistic collaboration, we can contribute to the rebuilding and revitalization of Ukraine, while promoting peace, understanding, and cultural exchange among nations.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to the possibility of discussing this project further and exploring potential avenues of collaboration. Your support would undoubtedly make a significant difference in the lives of countless Ukrainians and contribute to the broader goals of peace and development.

Yours sincerely,

Nikoloz Gvasalia 

Fermata Arts Foundation

According to the statement made by the Fermata Art Foundation and the decision of the organization. Nikoloz Gvasalia will leave the Fermata Foundation office (Brentwood 24) in America by August 1, with accumulated experience and a transformed physical body, as well as journalistic service experience. The remaining one month is required for the preparation process.

Over the past few days, I have been in contact with the admissions office at the local community college. The immigration service has confirmed my status, which remains valid until August 5th. The visa extension process did not allowed me to complete the application for a student (F1) visa.

After my status has been confirmed, I can now request to change my current status to student status based on the enrollment of the educational institution. This confirmation allows me to submit a new application, which will already establish my student status.

In order to complete the application, I require the I20 form provided by the community college. The admissions office has assured me that they will issue the I20 document within 2-3 weeks. Once I have the I20 document in hand, I will be able to submit a new application at the immigration center to obtain student status and pursue further studies at American higher education institutions.

I 539 Form Approval

Thieves in Law, also known as vory v zakone in Russian, are a distinctive criminal phenomenon that originated in the Soviet Union and continues to have a significant presence in post-Soviet countries. This essay aims to provide a historical overview of thieves in law, exploring their origins, evolution, and influence within the criminal underworld.

Origins in Soviet Era Thieves in law emerged during the Soviet era, particularly in the 1930s and 1940s. The harsh conditions of labor camps and prisons provided fertile ground for the development of a criminal subculture. In these environments, a hierarchical structure and a code of conduct known as “thieves’ traditions” began to take shape, forming the foundation of what would become thieves in law.
Criminal Culture and Hierarchy: Thieves in law operate based on a strict code of conduct and a hierarchical structure. They adhere to a set of rules and traditions that govern their behavior, interactions, and loyalty within the criminal community. Central to this culture is the concept of “thiefdom,” which embodies honor, loyalty, and respect among thieves in law.

Thieves in law have distinct symbols and rituals that help identify and differentiate them within the criminal underworld. These include specific tattoos, gestures, and phrases that serve as indicators of their status and affiliation. The symbolism associated with thieves in law reinforces their authority and reputation among their peers.
Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, thieves in law expanded their influence beyond prisons and labor camps. They began to infiltrate various sectors of society, including business, politics, and law enforcement. This expansion allowed them to establish control over illicit activities such as extortion, drug trafficking, and organized crime. Thieves in law networks expanded internationally as post-Soviet criminals migrated to different countries. These networks formed alliances with other criminal organizations, creating transnational criminal networks with a wide reach. The globalization of thieves in law networks contributed to their increased influence and posed challenges for law enforcement agencies worldwide.

Law enforcement agencies have faced significant challenges in combating thieves in law due to their sophisticated organizational structures and the loyalty of their members. Governments and international organizations have responded by implementing strategies aimed at disrupting criminal networks, strengthening law enforcement cooperation, and enhancing legal frameworks to combat organized crime.
Thieves in law represent a distinctive criminal phenomenon that originated in the Soviet Union and has continued to evolve in the post-Soviet era. Their hierarchical structure, distinct code of conduct, and influence within the criminal underworld have had far-reaching implications. Understanding the historical context, development, and modus operandi of thieves in law is crucial for effective law enforcement strategies and efforts to combat organized crime. By addressing the root causes and collaborating internationally, authorities can work towards dismantling these criminal networks and promoting a safer and more secure society.

The presence of thieves and criminal gangs in Georgia is a complex issue with multifaceted causes. This essay delves into the factors that contribute to the emergence of thieves in Georgia, particularly within the context of post-Soviet Caucasus countries. It examines the socio-economic conditions, historical background, and systemic challenges that shape the environment conducive to criminal activities.

Low Quality of Life: The post-Soviet era brought significant economic challenges to Georgia, including high unemployment rates, income disparities, and inadequate social welfare systems. The low quality of life experienced by many individuals creates a breeding ground for criminal activities as individuals seek alternative means to sustain themselves and their families.

Insufficient job prospects, limited access to education and skills training, and a lack of viable career paths contribute to the allure of criminal activities. The absence of legitimate avenues for social and economic advancement pushes individuals towards engaging in illicit activities as a means of survival.
a. Legacy of Soviet Rule: The legacy of Soviet rule in Georgia and other post-Soviet Caucasus countries has had a profound impact on the social fabric and governance structures. The collapse of the Soviet Union resulted in a power vacuum, weakened institutions, and rampant corruption, which created fertile ground for the rise of criminal networks and the emergence of thieves in law.

During the Soviet era, criminal networks and the culture of “thieves in law” gained prominence, creating an environment where criminal activities were accepted and even glorified. These criminal networks continued to exert influence in the post-Soviet era, perpetuating a culture of crime and providing a support system for individuals seeking illegal means of survival.
Inadequate law enforcement capabilities, corruption within law enforcement agencies, and a lack of trust in the justice system undermine efforts to combat criminal activities effectively. These challenges enable thieves and criminal gangs to operate with relative impunity, further perpetuating the cycle of crime.
The existence of powerful organized crime networks, often deeply entrenched in various sectors of society, poses a significant challenge to combating criminal activities. These networks exploit systemic weaknesses and use their influence to protect their illicit operations, making it difficult for law enforcement agencies to dismantle their operations effectively.

The presence of thieves and criminal gangs in Georgia is influenced by a complex interplay of socio-economic challenges, historical legacies, and systemic issues. Low quality of life, limited economic opportunities, and the influence of criminal networks all contribute to the allure of criminal activities.
Addressing these underlying factors requires a comprehensive approach, including socio-economic reforms, strengthening law enforcement institutions, promoting transparency, and combating corruption. By addressing the root causes, Georgia can create an environment that fosters legitimate opportunities and discourages criminal behaviors, leading to a safer and more prosperous society.

Due to the relocation of the F45 gym from Avon to Hartford, the morning schedule will not change and Fermata’s office departure time will be 8:20 am-8:35 am.
The time of return from training is determined from 10:30 am to 11:00 am on all days of the week.
Saturday – 11:00am-11:15am.

The exact time of my daily return home is 8:40 pm-8:50 pm in the evening. In case of exceptions, specific times will be notified by e-mail.

Context of the draft notices sent by the Russian government and the reasons behind the act of burning them. The draft notices sent by the Russian government not only refer to the conscription system within Russia but also highlight a concerning aspect of Russia’s foreign policy. There have been reports and allegations suggesting that Russian officials are actively attempting to draft individuals from abroad, including those residing in countries like Georgia, to serve in the Russian military and participate in conflicts, such as the ongoing war in Ukraine. This adds another layer of complexity to the act of burning draft notices in Georgia.

Burning the draft notices in this context takes on a heightened symbolism. It represents more than just a rejection of the conscription system, it signifies a resolute opposition to the perceived attempts by Russian officials to mobilize individuals from other countries for military engagements. By burning the draft notices, individuals in Georgia are not only resisting Russian influence but also expressing their refusal to be coerced into participating in what they view as an unjust and aggressive military campaign.
The act of burning the notices becomes a potent symbol of defiance against Russian attempts to expand their sphere of influence and involve foreign citizens in conflicts that are not their own. It sends a message that the people of Georgia, and potentially other affected nations, stand united in their resistance against such actions and are determined to safeguard their sovereignty, Individualism, and autonomy.

Protests involving the burning of draft notices have far-reaching implications on public opinion and the broader geopolitical dynamics in the region

The act of burning draft notices sent by the Russian government in Georgia has significant implications both domestically and internationally. This essay explores the impact of these protests on the domestic sentiment in Georgia, the international perception of the conflicts in the region, and the broader geopolitical consequences that may arise.

These protests can exert pressure on the Georgian government to take a stronger stance against Russia’s attempts to involve its citizens in foreign military campaigns. By expressing their defiance through these acts, the Georgian population demonstrates their determination to protect their interests and sovereignty.

It serves as a stark reminder of the tensions and conflicts between Georgia and Russia, showcasing the determination of affected nations to resist foreign attempts to involve their citizens in military endeavors. This can shape international perceptions and influence the discourse surrounding Russian actions in neighboring countries. The protests highlight the necessity of addressing the underlying issues and promoting diplomatic solutions to avoid further escalations.

Protests against the notices have broader implications for the geopolitical landscape. They have the potential to strain relations between Georgia and Russia even further, increasing tensions and potentially leading to diplomatic repercussions. These protests can also impact regional alliances as other nations observe Georgia’s response and evaluate their own positions. The determination displayed by the Georgian population in resisting conscription can inform and influence international policies and responses to Russian attempts to involve foreign citizens in conflicts beyond their borders. It may prompt nations to consider measures to protect their citizens and assert their sovereignty.

The act of burning draft notices in Georgia has multi-faceted consequences. Domestically, it serves as a rallying point, fostering national unity and pressuring the government to take a stronger stance against Russian influence. Internationally, it captures attention, shedding light on the complex geopolitical dynamics in the region and influencing the discourse surrounding Russian actions.

Geopolitically, these protests can strain relations and impact regional alliances, while also shaping international policies and responses to Russian attempts to involve foreign citizens in conflicts. The act of burning draft notices acts as a powerful symbol of resistance and determination, demonstrating the resolve of nations to protect their interests and sovereignty.

Given the gravity of the situation, it is crucial to conduct further research and gather verified information to provide a comprehensive understanding of the alleged attempts by Russian officials to draft individuals from abroad. This will ensure a balanced analysis of the implications and potential consequences of such actions on public opinion and the broader geopolitical dynamics in the region.

Vladimir Putin’s motivations and geopolitical objectives in the Caucasus region have been subjects of debate and speculation. Some argue that Putin seeks to reestablish control over the Caucasus and potentially other former Soviet states to increase Russia’s geopolitical influence, secure economic interests, and address security concerns. This essay examines these potential motivations and explores how Putin could pursue these goals.

Reestablishing control over the Caucasus would bolster Russia’s geopolitical influence in the region. By consolidating power and creating a political entity reminiscent of the Soviet Union, Putin could enhance Russia’s position as a major player in global politics. This would enable Russia to assert its influence, shape regional dynamics, and potentially counterbalance the influence of rival powers.

Economic Interests context – The Caucasus region holds significant economic importance due to its abundant natural resources, particularly oil and gas reserves. Gaining control over these resources would provide Russia with increased economic leverage and access to markets. By consolidating power in the Caucasus, Putin could secure energy resources vital for Russia’s economic growth, strengthen energy partnerships, and establish economic dominance in the region.

Putin may perceive the presence of independent elements in the Caucasus as a potential threat to Russian national security. Historical conflicts and the existence of separatist movements in the region have raised concerns about stability and the risk of extremist activities. Seeking to remove these individual elements and exerting control would allow Putin to maintain stability, prevent the region from becoming a breeding ground for separatist movements, and safeguard Russian interests.
Putin could employ various strategies to pursue his geopolitical objectives. Firstly, he could exert political influence by supporting sympathetic political parties or leaders in the region, thereby shaping the political landscape to align with Russian interests. Secondly, Russia’s economic leverage, through trade partnerships, investment, and control of energy resources, could be used to exert influence and gain economic dominance. Additionally, maintaining or increasing military presence, cyber operations, and information warfare tactics could help solidify control and deter challenges to Russian interests.
Putin’s pursuit of these objectives has significant implications for the sovereignty and stability of the Caucasus region. The potential erosion of the independence of these states may lead to internal conflicts, resistance from local populations, and strain regional stability. Additionally, his actions have drawn criticism from the international community, resulting in economic sanctions and strained relations with Western countries’ motivations to consolidate power and create a political entity reminiscent of the Soviet Union in the Caucasus that is rooted in geopolitical influence, economic interests, and security concerns. While the realization of these goals is speculative, considering these motivations provides insights into the potential trajectories of Russian policy in the region. The implications of such actions on regional stability and international relations highlight the complex nature of geopolitical dynamics in the Caucasus.

The presidency of Volodymyr Zelensky in Ukraine has been marred by allegations of corruption scandals within his government. While it is crucial to approach these claims with skepticism and rely on credible evidence, it is essential to examine the context, motivations, and potential consequences of such allegations to gain a comprehensive understanding of the situation. Various corruption scandals emerged during Zelensky’s presidency, alleging wrongdoing and misconduct within his government. These scandals range from accusations of bribery, embezzlement, and abuse of power by high-ranking officials. However, it is important to note that allegations alone do not necessarily equate to guilt, and due process and proper investigations must take place to determine the veracity of these claims. Corruption scandals can have far-reaching consequences for governance and public trust in the government. When allegations of corruption arise, they undermine the credibility and integrity of the administration. They also erode public trust in the ability of the government to serve the interests of the people and lead to disillusionment among citizens. Addressing and combating corruption is crucial for the functioning of a democratic society and the establishment of good governance.
To ensure transparency and accountability, it is imperative that thorough investigations into these corruption allegations take place. Independent investigative bodies and judicial institutions must be allowed to carry out their work without interference to determine the validity of the claims. If any wrongdoing is uncovered, it is essential that the responsible individuals are held accountable, regardless of their positions or affiliations. The role of media in reporting on corruption scandals is significant, as it helps shape public perception and influence the narrative surrounding these allegations. However, it is crucial to separate fact from speculation and rely on reputable sources of information. The media has a responsibility to report accurately and objectively, allowing the public to form informed opinions based on reliable information.
Allegations of corruption scandals within Zelensky’s government have cast a shadow over his presidency. While these allegations should be treated with skepticism and subject to proper investigations, addressing corruption is crucial for Ukraine’s development and stability. Thorough investigations, transparency, and accountability are necessary to restore public trust and maintain the integrity of the government. It is imperative that allegations of corruption are taken seriously and addressed through appropriate legal and investigative channels to ensure a fair and just society.

Russians out of Georgia is a contentious issue that has its roots in the complex historical, political, and socio-cultural dynamics between Russia and Georgia. My letter aims to provide an interpretation of the issue by examining multiple perspectives and delving into the cultural connection between the two nations. The viewpoints of Georgian nationalists, Russian officials, international observers, and the Georgian population, while also acknowledging the literary love for Georgia expressed by famous Russian writers.

Stalin, highlighting his deep connection to Georgia as a Russian.
Joseph Stalin once famously said, “I am Russian by nationality and Georgian by birth” – a statement that exemplifies the intricate relationship between Russia and Georgia. It is important to recognize the profound impact that famous Russian writers, such as Alexander Pushkin, Leo Tolstoy, and Anton Chekhov, had on Georgian culture and literature. Their love for Georgia and its unique cultural heritage serves as a testament to the enduring bond between the two nations.

Historical Context
Russia-Georgia Relations: To comprehend the complexities of the “Russians out of Georgia” issue, it is crucial to understand the historical context.
Over the centuries, Russia and Georgia have shared a multifaceted relationship, marked by both cooperation and conflict. Various historical events, such as the Russo-Georgian War and the Soviet era, have shaped the dynamics between the two nations, leaving a lasting impact on the present situation.

Georgian Nationalist Perspective and Shelter
While the issue of “Russians out of Georgia” is often discussed in the context of Georgian nationalists’ perspectives, it is crucial to explore the other side of the coin. In recent years, an increasing number of Russian youth have sought shelter in Georgia to escape the repressive regime under President Vladimir Putin.

The Quest for Freedom and Safety Russian youth who seek shelter in Georgia often do so out of a quest for freedom, safety, and the opportunity to exercise their fundamental human rights. They face limitations on freedom of expression, assembly, and association in Russia, prompting them to seek refuge in a country where such rights are more protected. These individuals may engage in political activism, advocacy, or journalism that challenges the Russian regime, leading to potential persecution and harassment.

Human Rights Concerns in Russia –
The Russian government has faced widespread criticism for its human rights record, including allegations of political repression, censorship, and violation of civil liberties. Journalists, activists, and opposition figures have been targeted, leading to a climate of fear and limited space for dissent. In this context, the decision of Russian youth to seek asylum in Georgia reflects the erosion of democratic principles and the importance of protecting human rights.

Safe Haven – Georgia, with its relatively more liberal political climate and commitment to human rights, has become an attractive destination for Russian youth seeking shelter. The country’s support for freedom of expression, independent media, and civil society organizations offers a welcoming environment for those fleeing political persecution in Russia. The presence of a vibrant Russian-speaking community and historical cultural ties further contribute to Georgia’s appeal as a haven.
While Georgia provides a sanctuary for Russian youth seeking refuge, challenges remain. These include the need for comprehensive asylum policies, adequate resources, and support mechanisms to facilitate the integration of these individuals into Georgian society. Balancing the protection of human rights with potential geopolitical complexities and strained relations with Russia is also an ongoing challenge.

International Obligations and Cooperation – The protection of human rights is an international concern, and cooperation between Georgia and the international community is crucial. Ensuring adherence to international human rights standards, providing legal and social support to those seeking asylum, and promoting dialogue between Russia and Georgia are essential in addressing the complex dynamics of the issue.

The presence of Russian youth seeking shelter in Georgia brings attention to the significance of human rights considerations. These individuals, driven by their quest for freedom and safety, highlight the importance of protecting fundamental rights and freedoms. While challenges exist, Georgia’s commitment to human rights and its role as a haven should be acknowledged. By fostering international cooperation and upholding human rights standards, a more inclusive and secure environment can be created for those seeking refuge from political repression.
International observers focus on conflict resolution, diplomatic efforts, and human rights considerations. They play a crucial role in facilitating dialogue and negotiation between Russia and Georgia, striving for a peaceful resolution that respects the rights of all parties involved.

The perspective of the Georgian population is deeply personal and influenced by individual experiences and collective trauma. Their narratives reflect the socio-economic implications of the issue and the desire for reconciliation, paving the way for a harmonious relationship between Russia and Georgia.

Literary Love for Georgia, Throughout history, renowned Russian writers have expressed their admiration and love for Georgia through their literary works. Alexander Pushkin’s “The Prisoner of the Caucasus,” Leo Tolstoy’s fascination with the Caucasus region, and Anton Chekhov’s fondness for the city of Tbilisi are examples of the enduring literary connections between Russia and Georgia. These works showcase the cultural richness and beauty that have inspired generations of writers.

The “Russians out of Georgia” issue is a complex matter that demands a nuanced understanding of historical, political, and cultural factors. By exploring multiple perspectives and acknowledging the literary love for Georgia expressed by famous Russian writers, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the intricacies of the relationship between Russia and Georgia. It is through open dialogue, empathy, and a commitment to finding common ground that the path toward resolution can be paved, ensuring a future that respects the aspirations and rights of both nations.

Interpretation – peace place Georgia!
About 5.2 million Ukrainians are registered as refugees in European countries, and 2.5 million Ukrainians have taken refuge in Russia. At the same time, the events in Russia are developing dramatically, where in September 2022, general military mobilization was announced.
This means that the armed forces are allowed to call up almost all healthy men from the age of 18 to the age of 55 for military service. These events, of course, caused great dissatisfaction among the Russian youth, and from the day of the announcement of the mobilization, the population began to flee the country. Unfortunately, Russian sources do not allow us to state the exact number, although according to unofficial data, 4 million people left Russia.
Most of Russian and Ukrainian migrants, of course, choose countries with strong economies for migration, that is, mainly Western European countries, but it seems that for the displaced population, only the economic situation is not important, although the economy of Georgia is not very strong, there are about 200,000 Ukrainians in our country and more than 400,000 Russians entered, As a percentage, if we compare these numbers with the population of Georgia, we will realize that this percentage is a very large number.
Why do Russians and Ukrainians choose Georgia?
In my opinion, the most real reason is the geographical location of Georgia, it turned out that Georgia directly borders the Russian Federation in the south-east, and after arriving in Georgia, almost all directions are open for Russian citizens, Georgia is not far from Ukraine, especially for those Ukrainians who took refuge in Russia after the war. The second solid reason is the closeness of mentality, although Russia, Ukraine, and Georgia are inhabited by different ethnic people, our mentality is quite close to each other, during the Soviet Union, generations grew up so that all three republics were part of one whole country, therefore upbringing, religion, mentality, makes it easier to adapt to a new environment and makes life in emigration much easier.
If we look at the statistics, 75% of the population entering the country is 32 years old or younger, and the majority of those entering choose Tbilisi, the capital of Georgia, to live in. Why do Russian and Ukrainian young people like Tbilisi? Well, Tbilisi is a historical, ancient city, but we can also confidently say that Tbilisi is also a modern European city. Living in the city is cheaper compared to other countries, the city is always alive and full of entertainment activities, and the nightlife culture in the capital of Georgia has been actively developing since the 2000s today it is even called the Berlin of Eastern Europe. First of all, there is freedom in there, you can freely hold a protest, and wear the clothes you want, this certainly causes a great cultural shock among the newly arrived Belarusian and Russian youth, and because of this they soon fall in love with Tbilisi. It is a small freedom island in a region. Hospitality is a big part of the Georgian mentality, it seems to be in our genetic code, there is no more fortunate moment for a Georgian than when a guest expresses satisfaction, that’s why our country is one of the favorite places for tourists from many other countries.
Tbilisi is the Jerusalem of peace for the youth tired of war, politics, and fighting, here you won’t find foreigners who fight each other because of politics, where everyone is surrounded by love for Georgia and eats delicious Georgian dishes.
the capital of youth, this is also a kind of art, the art of peace, which is established not by bombs but by love.

Today, May 23rd, I had a virtual meeting with Anna Hughes, Head of Admissions at Boston Woods College.

According to Ms. Hughes, the Boston College Admissions Office is excited about my application, however, unfortunately, Boston College has strict TOEFL score rules and at this time my academic admission would not be possible due to an insufficient TOEFL test score. However, according to Mrs. Hughes, in order not to waste time and to be able to start academic studies at Woods College in the future, it will be enough to accumulate 30 credits from the local community college, which is equivalent to one year of study with a 2.5 GPA. According to the head of admission, this will be the most realistic and optimal way to get a higher academic education in the future.